Jump to content

MetroShadow

Moderators
  • Content Count

    1440
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

MetroShadow last won the day on November 8

MetroShadow had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

195 Top Contributor

About MetroShadow

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Twitter
    _dividexzero
  • Instagram
    Dividexzero

Profile Information

  • Location
    Oakland, CA

Recent Profile Visitors

17703 profile views
  1. Did it when I was a 5th grader at Decatur Classical at West Ridge. Took a school bus charter to Rogers Park, rode the CNW to Ogilvie, went to the Fed and the Stock Market (and did a business there), and came right back. This was back in 97 though.
  2. Since Pace covers all six counties and the City, it’s customary and mandatory that public hearings be held in the city as part of that process.
  3. When I wrote the standards back in 2015-16, the key metrics are/were. - productivity: average ridership (weekday/sat/sun) Or per trip (premium) - cost per rider - Recovery ratio - cost per vehicle mile (it takes from LACMTA’s ratio of service miles. Or so I had thought) of course, other factors including service area AND classification matter (exurban areas are designed to be measured against each other; core lines measured against themselves, etc)
  4. As long as gas prices hover around $3, folks will continue to drive and TNCs will continue to thrive. another round of regionwide cuts - and it sucks to see the 540 bite the dust (I was personally rooting for it)
  5. This is pretty rad. Thanks for sharing. The McCormick short turns were deleted sometime in the late 2000’s. IIRC. And you’re right: those were pull ins (and also mall extras to supplant the 290 to Lincolnwood)
  6. Breakdown sidebar has been moved to the pinned post on breakdowns.
  7. Delete 226. Add 215 and 641. And increase frequency on 225. CTA will need to give up some bays.
  8. Considering a major service change can happen during any given cycle, it might be better to wait until August 2020 anyway. Usually it’s equipment, driver availability, and/or construction with bays.
  9. Correct. One thing of note: some routes are blocked to assign ONLY a certain bus. Each run may be assigned a certain size (example: west could assign a 35’ on the driver sheet and that’s what would be sent out - or somehow you’d get a 40’). I know of at least four other divisions that does this too. Essentially if trips have higher loads than others, the larger buses (artics if Pace had any) would have priority. Same for smaller loads and a 30’ would be pushed out
  10. Bus stop standards won’t allow it, ADA requirements won’t allow it. Walkability isn’t allowed either.
  11. Great shots. /just a little homesick right now
  12. Correct but with service changes, its driver and equipment availability.
  13. Not necessarily. You can do them wholesale and implement changes incrementally. Doesn’t violate title VI, especially with wholesale restructuring. Boards may approve or amend at the monthly meetings Case in point, AC Transit has two restructuring: local service was done in phases with the public hearings done before them. Public Hearings: 2014-15 implementation dates: 2015, Summer 2016, March 2017, June 2018, December 2019, 2020-21 local: public hearing in 2017 implementation: 2018-present (the closure of Salesforce TC and driver shortages can stall it). My students wants AC transit to reject the F line changes after I spoke at the hearing and the board approved all of the changes.
×
×
  • Create New...