Danielsmusic Posted December 27, 2007 Report Posted December 27, 2007 I was walking home from the Sedgwick station west on North Avenue. I passed Hudson, and looked down the street to see what condition the now-closed Hudson temporary station house was in. What I saw was a 4400-series bus. As I walked closer, it became apparent that this bus was a 4900-series bus, not a 4400-series bus. It is now labeled WB-10. If you want to see pictures, go to: http://web.mac.com/danreiner/iWeb/Site%202...20Pictures.html Quote
BusExpert32 Posted December 27, 2007 Report Posted December 27, 2007 I was walking home from the Sedgwick station west on North Avenue. I passed Hudson, and looked down the street to see what condition the now-closed Hudson temporary station house was in. What I saw was a 4400-series bus. As I walked closer, it became apparent that this bus was a 4900-series bus, not a 4400-series bus. It is now labeled WB-10. If you want to see pictures, go to: http://web.mac.com/danreiner/iWeb/Site%202...20Pictures.html Thanks for posting a report with photos. The photos prove it all. Quote
qwantae Posted December 28, 2007 Report Posted December 28, 2007 Thanks for posting a report with photos. The photos prove it all. Yeah, these photos like one of our X-mas Presents, I mean I just love to see these 4900s surviving, It still looks good with the back window. Quote
Buslover88 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Posted December 28, 2007 Thanks for posting a report with photos. The photos prove it all. I have one problem with this: are you saying you won't believe anyone without a photo? Quote
Danielsmusic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Posted December 28, 2007 I have one problem with this: are you saying you won't believe anyone without a photo? No, I think he's saying that, while he would believe the story without the pictures, there is still no way to be 100% sure that the story's true. I mean, realistically, anyone can say anything, but no one knows it's completely true if it's not substantiated. Quote
BusExpert32 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Posted December 28, 2007 No, I think he's saying that, while he would believe the story without the pictures, there is still no way to be 100% sure that the story's true. I mean, realistically, anyone can say anything, but no one knows it's completely true if it's not substantiated. Exactly true. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.