95 New Flyer/Flexible Running 49 Western-79th

[ctaboy]

I was on Western + 71st St and I saw a northbound Flexible and a southbound New Flyer running 49 Western.

[cta5658]

i think those were fill ins

[Buslover88]

That is werid, but I will agree with CTA5658.

[Busjack]

Sort of sounds like the old days, when 49 Western was split among NP and 69th.

[artthouwill]

I was on Western + 71st St and I saw a northbound Flexible and a southbound New Flyer running 49 Western.

I believe what you saw were actually 67 67/69/71 buses out of 74th. This route runs along Western between 69th and 71st. And 74th has 95 Flxs and NF.

[Busjack]

I believe what you saw were actually 67 67/69/71 buses out of 74th. This route runs along Western between 69th and 71st. And 74th has 95 Flxs and NF.

The ambiguity in the title of this thread, which might put cold water on part of this theory, is that 95 refers twice to New Flyer, in which case it would have referred (barring anything recently happening) to a NP bus. However, if a 1995 NF were on 49, it would create a hole on BusTracker. ctaboy could clarify this.

67 would certainly explain the Flx, unless ctaboy can say that he saw the electronic signs (and they were not frozen).

[ctaboy]

The ambiguity in the title of this thread, which might put cold water on part of this theory, is that 95 refers twice to New Flyer, in which case it would have referred (barring anything recently happening) to a NP bus. However, if a 1995 NF were on 49, it would create a hole on BusTracker. ctaboy could clarify this.

67 would certainly explain the Flx, unless ctaboy can say that he saw the electronic signs (and they were not frozen).

it wasn't frozen,it was on 71st/Western and it said 49 Western-79th