Jump to content

Subway Rehabs


sw4400

Recommended Posts

Looking at all the work done recently... the Brown Line rehab of stations and slow zones, the Blue Line slow zone work, the Red Line slow zone and station work north of Belmont and this Spring, south of Roosevelt one thing comes to mind... the Dearborn and State St. Subways. The Dearborn Subway went into service February 25, 1951- 63 years ago and the State St. Subway went into service October 17, 1943- 70 years ago later this year. I know the stations have had work done to them, but what about the actual subway tunnels themselves(aside from the lighting and exit signs)? Structural integretity could start to deterorate over the past half century. Maybe tunnel rehabs were done sometime in the 1980's or 1990's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the summer of 1991, there was the weekend closures of the State Street subway. All Howard/Englewood/Jackson Park trains were rerouted to the elevated structure except the weekends of Taste of Chicago. The work was mostly a deep scrub and minor track work and station maintenance/painting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Subway tunnels, if built properly, can last a long time. Out east, there are some railroad tunnels pushing (or exceeding) 100 years old.

I gotta agree with you on that. Personally, I think Chicago subways were well built and built to last. As an example, look at the New York transit system. As you stated, some of the oldest tunnels (cut and cover and deep bore) exist on IRT Division, particularly the Lexington Ave and Broadway-7th Ave branches. And despite the age, exposure to the elements and the constant pounding from heavy steel local and express trains (most of them being 10 cars long; 7 Flushing line runs 11 car trains), this piece of civil engineering has stood the test of time. And they're still going strong. Just take a look at the YouTube video of the 86th street station on the Broadway-7th Ave Line: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGfCLhWHDdY

So, while Chicago's subways may not be as extensive as New York's, they're still just as well built. However, maintenance is a must. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

So, while Chicago's subways may not be as extensive as New York's, they're still just as well built. However, maintenance is a must. :)

The main issue in Chicago seems water leakage, rather than imminent collapse.

If they took getting inundated when someone punched through the freight tunnel in the early 90s, they must be pretty sturdy. I assume that a lot of water pressure was exerted on the exterior of the subway walls,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...