Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, CircleSeven said:

The NITA website just went live within an hour or so.

It’s pretty much the same RTA site. All they’ve done was swapped the gray look for the light blue/dark blue (bottom of the site), the urls, and the logo on the header.

There's some useful stuff there. Besides the url being on illinois.gov, the Board of Directors page has all of the appointments. It's going to take some time to decipher the interlocking appointments.

I also wonder how permanent the logo is, but I'm sure one of the first orders of business for the service boards will be ordering new decals.:D

 

Posted
1 minute ago, pudgym29 said:

Interesting that the domain is ".gov"; not ".org", or ".com". 🤨

As I noted above., they are sitting on the state's domain, illinois.gov, not on its own domain.

Personally, I think .gov makes sense, since it isn't a commercial or charitable entity, but I thought that, until recently, .gov was restricted to the federal government. Maybe something like nita.il.us would make more sense, but the .us domain never caught on.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Busjack said:

There's some useful stuff there. Besides the url being on illinois.gov, the Board of Directors page has all of the appointments. It's going to take some time to decipher the interlocking appointments.

I also wonder how permanent the logo is, but I'm sure one of the first orders of business for the service boards will be ordering new decals.:D

 

To quote the kids - "graphic design is also my passion..."

Posted
6 minutes ago, MetroShadow said:

To quote the kids - "graphic design is also my passion..."

Essentially why I thought "they eventually will come up with something better than that." I could do that with MacDraw about 35 years ago.

Another snide comment on my part: The rta dumped its 50-year-old logo and developed a new one (only vehicles carrying it are those with new Pace wraps) just in time to go out of business.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Busjack said:

As I noted above., they are sitting on the state's domain, illinois.gov, not on its own domain.

Personally, I think .gov makes sense, since it isn't a commercial or charitable entity, but I thought that, until recently, .gov was restricted to the federal government. Maybe something like nita.il.us would make more sense, but the .us domain never caught on.

With ".us" domains, there is no hiding who is the registrar for that domain.  A genuine human being must be listed as the contact person. Just about every other domain registrar with which you can obtain a W-WW domain name (I use Porkbun for my W-WW domain.) will register you with a "domains by privacy" facet; such that, if someone wants to learn who is the person maintaining the W-WW site, they will have to make a proper request to the privacy provider.. This deflects a would-be person who wants to complain about the content being presented by that domain from making a spurious takedown claim. 

Posted
39 minutes ago, pudgym29 said:

With ".us" domains, there is no hiding who is the registrar for that domain.  A genuine human being must be listed as the contact person. Just about every other domain registrar with which you can obtain a W-WW domain name (I use Porkbun for my W-WW domain.) will register you with a "domains by privacy" facet; such that, if someone wants to learn who is the person maintaining the W-WW site, they will have to make a proper request to the privacy provider.. This deflects a would-be person who wants to complain about the content being presented by that domain from making a spurious takedown claim. 

Again, notwithstanding this verbiage, there is a simple answer who the registrars are: il.us (Illinois Century Network; i.e. the state), and  .gov (America's Cyber Defense Agency).  The latter says: "Unlike the other domains, .gov is reserved exclusively for U.S.-based government organizations. Only verified federal, state, local, tribal or territorial (SLTT) entities can register for it. " So, NITA piggybacked on the more secure domain.

As far as "takedown requests," it doesn't appear that members of the public are posting copyrighted material to any .gov site. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Busjack said:

Essentially why I thought "they eventually will come up with something better than that." I could do that with MacDraw about 35 years ago.

Another snide comment on my part: The rta dumped its 50-year-old logo and developed a new one (only vehicles carrying it are those with new Pace wraps) just in time to go out of business.

That new branding went so hard. I don't think anyone would complain if they reused it. The lowercase "n" and "i" letterforms are very compatible.

Posted
10 hours ago, wayfaringrob said:

That new branding went so hard. I don't think anyone would complain if they reused it. The lowercase "n" and "i" letterforms are very compatible.

But I think the legislature intended a break from the past. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...