JolietJakeCTA Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 I have a question about PACE's 1979 Grumman/Flxible 870 buses (the 8200 series, IIRC), 205 units strong, of which they were initially withdrawn due to cracked frames (an issue that affected almost all the 2,656 total 870s Grumman had built, for all the transit agencies they received orders from, up to 1980) and temporarily replaced, in this case, by 100 retired school buses: when did PACE, as PACE, finally retire them? Right now, I think the RTA 870s were finally withdrawn for the last time when the 1992-93 Orion I's (2200/2300s) were put into service. This "A" frame problem had hurt New York City the most (its fleet was over 600 units strong out of a theoretical order of 800), for which its last 200 undelivered units were filled in by GMC RTS buses. ~Ben Edge (JolietJakeCTA) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesi2282 Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 The 8200-series Grumman 870's were all retired in 1993, the last of the 8200's were based at West Division and were replaced by the 2200-series Ikarus 416's, which have since been retired as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JolietJakeCTA Posted September 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 The 8200-series Grumman 870's were all retired in 1993, the last of the 8200's were based at West Division and were replaced by the 2200-series Ikarus 416's, which have since been retired as well. Thank you very much. ~Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Thank you very much. ~Ben BTW, Do you still want your four fried chickens and a coke? Or heres a more appropriate question that would fit in this site, How often does the train go by? :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesi2282 Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Found this video on YouTube of an 1970s news story about the Grummans being taken out of service, has some shots of RTA Grummans and a CTA New Look. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JolietJakeCTA Posted September 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 The lineup of the 1979 Grummans were: 8201 to 8300 - model 45102-8-1, 35 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine 8301 to 8405 - model 53102-8-1, 40 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine The last Flxible bus PACE ever bought was a model 870 "B" 40102-6T built as a demo bus in 1982, #8406, purchased in 1984 by PACE, 40 feet long, Detroit Diesel 6V-92TA engine, as a replacement for a wrecked 1976 GMC "New Look" T6H-4523A (#8123). "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses." - Elwood Jake Blues ~Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesi2282 Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 The 2200s were actually built in 1992, the only buses Pace was buying in the late 1980s was the Gillig Phantom and Orion I. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Found this video on YouTube of an 1970s news story about the Grummans being taken out of service, has some shots of RTA Grummans and a CTA New Look. Wow, nice find Jesi, Thanks a lot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Wow, nice find Jesi, Thanks a lot! I hadn't realized that that many (at least the way it appeared on the video) had been assigned to Nortran at that time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 The lineup of the 1979 Grummans were: 8201 to 8300 - model 45102-8-1, 35 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine 8301 to 8405 - model 53102-8-1, 40 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine Bill V. has the 8200s as 53102-8-1, and 8301s up as 53096-8-1. I couldn't tell the difference between a narrow and wide one, but don't remember any shorties. Does any one else (especially since the GMs were 4523s--35 footers)? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainman8119 Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Bill V. has the 8200s as 53102-8-1, and 8301s up as 53096-8-1. I couldn't tell the difference between a narrow and wide one, but don't remember any shorties. Does any one else (especially since the GMs were 4523s--35 footers)? I don't think there were any 35 foot Grummans...they were all 40's. Also, I think only the 8400's were a tad bit wider...I could be wrong, but I think that was the case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 The lineup of the 1979 Grummans were: 8201 to 8300 - model 45102-8-1, 35 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine 8301 to 8405 - model 53102-8-1, 40 feet long, Detroit Diesel 8V-71N engine The last Flxible bus PACE ever bought was a model 870 "B" 40102-6T built as a demo bus in 1982, #8406, purchased in 1984 by PACE, 40 feet long, Detroit Diesel 6V-92TA engine, as a replacement for a wrecked 1976 GMC "New Look" T6H-4523A (#8123). "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark and we're wearing sunglasses." - Elwood Jake Blues ~Ben BTW, I falsified my renewal, I put down 1060 w Addison! "1060 W Addison? Thats Wrigley Field!" Illinois Nazis, I hate Illinois Nazis! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JolietJakeCTA Posted September 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Bill V. has the 8200s as 53102-8-1, and 8301s up as 53096-8-1. I couldn't tell the difference between a narrow and wide one, but don't remember any shorties. Does any one else (especially since the GMs were 4523s--35 footers)? On OMOT.org, #8201 to 8300 are all 45102-8-1s and #8301 to 8405 are all 53096-8-1s. #8406, a 1983 Flxible Metro "A" 40102-6T, was a demo bus said to be the first with the sliding windows. ~Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 On OMOT.org, #8201 to 8300 are all 45102-8-1s and #8301 to 8405 are all 53096-8-1s. #8406, a 1983 Flxible Metro "A" 40102-6T, was a demo bus said to be the first with the sliding windows. ~Ben There have been other inaccuracies there, such as 9001 series CTA RTSs, whcih were actually Detroit SMART. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busfan2847 Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 On OMOT.org, #8201 to 8300 are all 45102-8-1s and #8301 to 8405 are all 53096-8-1s. #8406, a 1983 Flxible Metro "A" 40102-6T, was a demo bus said to be the first with the sliding windows. ~Ben Looking at a photo of 8237 on Mel Bernero's Pace photos: ( http://s195.photobucket.com/albums/z30/melbernero/Illinois/PACE/?action=view¤t=Pace8237Southwest8237.jpg) It certainly looks like a 40' not a 35' bus. He also has photos of 8304 and 8406 on the site. Alan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busfan2847 Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Link didn't work! It goes to page 1 of his Pace photographs and the Flxible photos are on page 2. Looking at a photo of 8237 on Mel Bernero's Pace photos: ( http://s195.photobucket.com/albums/z30/melbernero/Illinois/PACE/?action=view¤t=Pace8237Southwest8237.jpg) It certainly looks like a 40' not a 35' bus. He also has photos of 8304 and 8406 on the site. Alan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JolietJakeCTA Posted September 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Link didn't work! It goes to page 1 of his Pace photographs and the Flxible photos are on page 2. Try this link: Anyway, now I see what you mean by this being 40' long and not 35' long. Looks like OMOT.org made a mistake, and that it should read model 53102-8-1 for units #8201-8300. ~Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetroShadow Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Try this link: Anyway, now I see what you mean by this being 40' long and not 35' long. Looks like OMOT.org made a mistake, and that it should read model 53102-8-1 for units #8201-8300. ~Ben Wait....the 8200's had electronic destination signs?! This is news to me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twyztdmynd Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 I agree. There were no 35' Grummans in the RTA. In addition, the 8400's had W/C Lifts. 8404 was my favorate. Maybe the 35' bus you are refering to is the Gillig Phantoms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Wait....the 8200's had electronic destination signs?! This is news to me! Apparently Pace did some retrofitting; I also saw some 8000s in Wilmette with them near the end. While the pictures of the museum pieces don't reflect that, his of 8075 does (I remember one with a handwritten roll sign in Hammond). Obviously the Grummans were better known for the very large roll signs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetroShadow Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 Apparently Pace did some retrofitting; I also saw some 8000s in Wilmette with them near the end. While the pictures of the museum pieces don't reflect that, his of 8075 does (I remember one with a handwritten roll sign in Hammond). Obviously the Grummans were better known for the very large roll signs. I remember the 8000's with the electronic signs, that's a fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 Fox Chicago has done it again. The file footage illustrating the story about running Pace buses on expressway shoulders had white and yellow buses at Rosemont, including a painted Nortran 400, and the newest bus was, you guessed it, a Grumman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 Fox Chicago has done it again. The file footage illustrating the story about running Pace buses on expressway shoulders had white and yellow buses at Rosemont, including a painted Nortran 400, and the newest bus was, you guessed it, a Grumman. WGN does the same thing they use file footage usually Elgin showing the retired #2500 series ElDorados. And Orion Is from NW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.