Jump to content
Busjack

2018 CTA budget

Recommended Posts

Actually, there isn't one yet, and like in the Claypool years, it's overdue, but this Tribune article indicates what's really happening.Seems like CTA can't bite the bullet on fare increases, although state transportation funding is down and the state Dept. of Revenue is taking a 2% collection fee out of retailers' occupation taxes, including the RTA's.

This Sun-Times article also indicates that there is some aldermanic resistance to a fee hike on ride haling to give the money to CTA, but it doesn't appear in retrospect that that's what's holding up the budget.

But the RTA seems to know what the CTA is attempting to pull off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Busjack said:

Actually, there isn't one yet, and like in the Claypool years, it's overdue, but this Tribune article indicates what's really happening.Seems like CTA can't bite the bullet on fare increases, although state transportation funding is down and the state Dept. of Revenue is taking a 2% collection fee out of retailers' occupation taxes, including the RTA's.

This Sun-Times article also indicates that there is some aldermanic resistance to a fee hike on ride haling to give the money to CTA, but it doesn't appear in retrospect that that's what's holding up the budget.

But the RTA seems to know what the CTA is attempting to pull off.

Rahm is trying to keep his south side improvements intact for the 2019 mayoral race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, artthouwill said:

Rahm is trying to keep his south side improvements intact for the 2019 mayoral race.

Could be, but as the article somewhat reminds us, he ran on fare b.s. before, when he claimed to have held the line on fares, but he later said he was only referring to the $2.25 base fare, and not all the passes that were raised then.

I take it what you are implying is that if the choice is fare hikes or service cuts, he doesn't want the 4 and 95 extensions cut.However, the real question is whether he will allow a 50 cent fare hike to be imposed now so that it is forgotten by 2019. That's standard political theory around here, but it sure didn't work for Toni Preckwinkle, with the beverage tax being rammed through with a promise of no sales or property tax hikes until 2020.

Anyway, under his administration, service cuts have been pretty much restricted to the north and northwest side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Busjack said:

Could be, but as the article somewhat reminds us, he ran on fare b.s. before, when he claimed to have held the line on fares, but he later said he was only referring to the $2.25 base fare, and not all the passes that were raised then.

I take it what you are implying is that if the choice is fare hikes or service cuts, he doesn't want the 4 and 95 extensions cut.However, the real question is whether he will allow a 50 cent fare hike to be imposed now so that it is forgotten by 2019. That's standard political theory around here, but it sure didn't work for Toni Preckwinkle, with the beverage tax being rammed through with a promise of no sales or property tax hikes until 2020.

Anyway, under his administration, service cuts have been pretty much restricted to the north and northwest side.

At least with the fare hike , and to some extent if RTA doesn't approve a budget without (or forces) service cuts, he can blame the State and Bruce Rauner for funding cuts. It's political gamesmanship. The South and West Sides are his political bases and he needs them to have a real chance to stay in office.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, artthouwill said:

At least with the fare hike , and to some extent if RTA doesn't approve a budget without (or forces) service cuts, he can blame the State and Bruce Rauner for funding cuts. It's political gamesmanship. The South and West Sides are his political bases and he needs them to have a real chance to stay in office.

We still not voting for him this time 😂😂

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sam92 said:

We still not voting for him this time 😂😂

Who can beat him?  Preckwinkle killed her chance with the soda tax.  Will Chewy run again?  Ricardo Munoz?  Dorothy Brown?  Forest Claypool?  Doesn't seem to be any candidates strong enough to challenge him. But he has to play his cards right with the CTA budget as to not give anyone any momentum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, artthouwill said:

Who can beat him?  Preckwinkle killed her chance with the soda tax.  Will Chewy run again?  Ricardo Munoz?  Dorothy Brown?  Forest Claypool?  Doesn't seem to be any candidates strong enough to challenge him. But he has to play his cards right with the CTA budget as to not give anyone any momentum.

You seem mired in past failures. It's obvious that the police troubles have eroded his south side base, and CTU or its ilk will find a more viable candidate. Don't forget, the President isn't Mitt Romney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to avoid spraying to all fields, and especially since this speaks to CTA "governance"

17 minutes ago, garmon757 said:

So RTA is pressuring Carter to come up with a budget along with a fare hike or be doomed!

The letter is in the second link. 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-cta-fares-rta-20171114-story.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/wisniewski/ct-rta-cta-letter-20171114-htmlstory.html

Interesting that the first clause in the letter is "In the preliminary 2018 operating budget submitted to the RTA on October 23rd." In short, by the deadline by which Pace and Metra published their preliminary budgets* and the boards ordered public hearings on them, CTA also had a preliminary budget it submitted to the RTA but did not publish it.

The letter does confirm how the RTA knew what CTA was pulling off. Maybe it should be like its siblings and play by the rules.

___________

*Also note the statement "In order to maintain desired service levels, Metra and Pace have both submitted proposed 2018 budgets which contain necessary fare increases to offset their funding reductions and balance with their required expense levels." (emphasis added)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A stronger black or Hispanic candidate can beat him easily. But Toni preckwinkle's political career is probably over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Busjack said:

Trying to avoid spraying to all fields, and especially since this speaks to CTA "governance"

Interesting that the first clause in the letter is "In the preliminary 2018 operating budget submitted to the RTA on October 23rd." In short, by the deadline by which Pace and Metra published their preliminary budgets* and the boards ordered public hearings on them, CTA also had a preliminary budget it submitted to the RTA but did not publish it.

The letter does confirm how the RTA knew what CTA was pulling off. Maybe it should be like its siblings and play by the rules.

___________

*Also note the statement "In order to maintain desired service levels, Metra and Pace have both submitted proposed 2018 budgets which contain necessary fare increases to offset their funding reductions and balance with their required expense levels." (emphasis added)

Notice how the Tribune said it was rare for RTA to send a letter to CTA. It makes me wonder if Carter has something up his sleeve in countering RTA demand because of the fact that CTA hasn't increase fares excluding passes in almost a decade. Two can play the same game eh? Just for kicks: someone in the comment section (in the Tribune) of that article said that RTA or CTA should stop stealing and mismanaging. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, garmon757 said:

It makes me wonder if Carter has something up his sleeve in countering RTA demand

Predictably, the Sun-Times, while also publishing the letter, has a much more political slant on it, especially on what Emanuel is calculating (which gets @artthouwill back on topic).

Also, I don't buy Steele's assertion that this is an "unprecedented challenge." We were told that 2008 and 2010 were much worse.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Busjack said:

Also, I don't buy Steele's assertion that this is an "unprecedented challenge." We were told that 2008 and 2010 were much worse.

In which I don't even bother jumping into that nonsense. If only politics can stay on it's course but it doesn't in Chicago nor this state. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Busjack said:

In afternoon news, the Sun-Times has Emanuel indicating support for fare hikes, but not service cuts,citing, as @artthouwill did, not going back on the south side expansions.

Yeah but how can there not be a service cut #54A is not getting cut next year? Fare hikes would indicate the budget is short yet again. All these old #6400's driving around is probably not helping the budget. Don't know why else the budget would be short unless ridership went down. The politicos have been introducing new legislation to help fund transit so I don't know why they would be short.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, BusHunter said:

Yeah but how can there not be a service cut #54A is not getting cut next year?

No, its being given to Pace. It isn't being cut due to the budget, as like what happened in 2010.

51 minutes ago, BusHunter said:

Don't know why else the budget would be short

Obviously you didn't read any of the linked articles. The RTA is short because sales tax receipts are down, the state is taking 2% of them as a collection fee, and state transportation appropriations are down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Busjack said:

No, its being given to Pace. It isn't being cut due to the budget, as like what happened in 2010.

Obviously you didn't read any of the linked articles. The RTA is short because sales tax receipts are down, the state is taking 2% of them as a collection fee, and state transportation appropriations are down.

And is Pace sending a bus up Cicero from Irving pk blue line? No, so that sounds like a service cut to me if certain communities are not served. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, BusHunter said:

And is Pace sending a bus up Cicero from Irving pk blue line? No, so that sounds like a service cut to me if certain communities are not served. 

 

Apparently, but that has nothing to do with this. Some consultant must have figured there was no passenger count between Montrose and Foster. Most of that faces a railroad berm and the Edens Expressway. Similarly, that consultant must have figured out that the next generation of little old ladies wasn't riding 210.

As you said way back when the NS Coordination Project was announced, it's a service cut. It wasn't provoked by the 2018 budget, but a 2016 plan under which CTA rightfully decided it should be cutting back overlap with Pace. In turn, Pace consultants decided to run 215 and Route C (621) as planned--including new service on Pulaski-Crawford north of Peterson.. If the people in Mayfair don't like it,  they can comment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×