Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Bus1883 said:

Last year a 8350 was involved in a accident on Valentine’s Day… now its another one… 8792 a year later on the same day

That was #8660 which got involved in a fire and ever since 8660 has since disappeared just like 7950

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
26 minutes ago, Bus1883 said:

#8841 was involved in a accident at the intersection of Chicago and Homan

The 8350s are having bad luck, I’m hoping some of these accidents are repairable. I’m guessing as long as there’s no frame damage and no legal issues CTA would repair and put it back in service. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Javi75 said:

The 8350s are having bad luck, I’m hoping some of these accidents are repairable. I’m guessing as long as there’s no frame damage and no legal issues CTA would repair and put it back in service. 

That was caused by a nut who fired a gun on the Ike at Austin & fled, hit a woman & then he crashed into the bus on Homan & the cops shot & killed him there.

The entire thing is on CWB Chicago: https://cwbchicago.com/2026/03/cop-fatally-shoots-driver-who-struck-woman-cta-bus-while-fleeing-stop-tied-to-possible-expressway-shooting-cpd.html

Posted
5 hours ago, strictures said:

That was caused by a nut who fired a gun on the Ike at Austin & fled, hit a woman & then he crashed into the bus on Homan & the cops shot & killed him there.

The entire thing is on CWB Chicago: https://cwbchicago.com/2026/03/cop-fatally-shoots-driver-who-struck-woman-cta-bus-while-fleeing-stop-tied-to-possible-expressway-shooting-cpd.html

As shown on WGN, the car driver sped out of the alley and T-boned the bus.

Posted
On 3/9/2026 at 10:30 PM, Javi75 said:

The 8350s are having bad luck, I’m hoping some of these accidents are repairable. I’m guessing as long as there’s no frame damage and no legal issues CTA would repair and put it back in service. 

The buses are repairable. They will be back depending on the situation 

Posted

Around 2000, NovaBus advertised that the rubber skirt panel could take a hit, almost exactly like that one. Maybe the bus wasn't even damaged.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
2 minutes ago, Erin Mishkin Jr. said:

#8912 and #1192 have collided with each other on the 82 at lake and both buses got pretty bad damage

It’s going to be a long road to lawsuits. Hard to determine who was at fault as they mentioned another vehicle involved

IMG_5252.jpeg

IMG_5253.jpeg

Posted
10 minutes ago, Erin Mishkin Jr. said:

#8912 and #1192 have collided with each other on the 82 at lake and both buses got pretty bad damage

I think both buses are done for as far as the damage from the angles u can’t see the damage but on 1192’s behalf it looks like 1423 when it hit the L structure downtown 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Bus1883 said:

I think both buses are done for as far as the damage from the angles u can’t see the damage but on 1192’s behalf it looks like 1423 when it hit the L structure downtown 

I’m over there right now the tow truck is pulling 1192 out but can’t because the red car is in the way

IMG_7606.jpeg

IMG_7602.jpeg

IMG_7605.jpeg

IMG_7580.jpeg

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Tribune article on the accident. Again, similar to when the driver was decapitated when a bus was impaled  on the MilwN overpass over Milwaukee Ave., I'm surprised that the drivers on this board are more concerned about the buses than "a CTA driver critically wounded." 

Posted
14 hours ago, Shannon tahoeppv said:

1192 definitely getting knocked off that bus finna get stripped & have a LTH sticker 

In this scenario does CTA make a claim against the driver of the sedan, can cta sue someone for damage to CTA property?

Posted

This is an unfortunate wrap on 1192 as u can see the top left of the roof on the drivers side has been chipped along with all the heavy damage it took. 8912 may see the chopping block as well

IMG_5265.jpeg

Posted
5 hours ago, Bus1883 said:

This is an unfortunate wrap on 1192 as u can see the top left of the roof on the drivers side has been chipped along with all the heavy damage it took. 8912 may see the chopping block as well

IMG_5265.jpeg

Once the litigation process has concluded we probably will see #8912 again at some point, the bus is still under warranty as of right now. #1192 will get retired due to it's age, the litigation timeline and the overall damage sustained. It's a shame a lot of these recent #8350s haven't even hit two years old yet and they've had major accidents already. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Javi75 said:

In this scenario does CTA make a claim against the driver of the sedan, can cta sue someone for damage to CTA property?

Sure CTA can sue, and the driver will probably be joined in any litigation as a necessary party, but unless he has sufficient liability insurance,  it won't matter.

55 minutes ago, YoungBusLover said:

...the bus is still under warranty as of right now. . .

How many times do I have to repeat that the warranty only covers manufacturer's defects,  not accidental damage? Hyundai will not pay if you drive your car into an L pillar,  unless the collision radar system didn't work as represented. 

And to repeat another point--why is it more important to the bus operator community that a bus can be repaired than one of your colleagues is lying in critical condition in [presumably] Stroger Hospital? I really want to know. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...