Jump to content

More Bus Moves


sw4400

Recommended Posts

LOL I didn't even glance at the 77th Buses in line. Thanks. And don't be too hard on 77th this time around. They did just give 31 artics a week ago though for very dumb reasons. If traffic was a detriment to artic use on the #79, 77th had other busy routes that could have made use of them and didn't suffer the traffic delays of 79th Street. Oh well, the #22 and #26 are benefiting from some extra artic use.

Operating artics on local routes has always been a very difficult problem because of longer dwell times as with artics you have longer headways and thus more passengers getting on/off per stop. This is why most cities that have been successful artic operators have used them on limited-stop, usually expressway, high-ridership routes. Cities that tried to use them on local routes have in many cases abandoned the idea, and not replaced old ones as they max-age out. For instance, Milwaukee. Bought the Ikaruses for Freeway Flyers, but discovered capacity was just not needed, made a few efforts to use on school trippers on routes like the 15, but once the Ikaruses were retired, they were not replaced. When CTA had more expressway routes like the 99, 99M, 162, 164 there was a use for more artics. But running one on Broadway? Come on. The reality is that even on LSD routes like 146 and 147, Artics are still much, much slower over the road than a standard bus. I saw this many times driving the 6.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1266 is on #47

#1353 #1679 and #1694 are on #67

#1820 and #1905 remains on #9 while having #1253 and #1272 on that route.

If anybody can check out #49 to see if any NP buses have 74th run numbers, that would be awesome.

1266 is back at NP since it's on the N22 this late night/early morning. So as I suspected those random NFs at 74th were loans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remind me of the good days when #94 was part of Chicago before 74th! :D

Well when Chicago had runs on that route, the route was shared by both Chicago and 74th with Chicago having more runs than 74th during most days of service and thus considered the main garage. For that reason, during those days the 94 had more NFs than Novas in service because Chicago's Nova count was a handful compared to today. :D Around the same time that NP gave up its 20 Novas, if I'm not mistaken the 94 went completely to 74th and became mostly run with Novas even when 74th's NFs outnumbered its Novas.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well when Chicago had runs on that route, the route was shared by both Chicago and 74th with Chicago having more runs than 74th during most days of service and thus considered the main garage. For that reason, during those days the 94 had more NFs than Novas in service because Chicago's Nova count was a handful compared to today. :D Around the same time that NP gave up its 20 Novas, if I'm not mistaken the 94 went completely to 74th and became mostly run with Novas even when 74th's NFs outnumbered its Novas.

You're not mistaken at all because you're correct. To me, it think it was more convenient when #94 was operated by Chicago because on 74th's behalf, I was on that route a few months ago when I looked at the clever device and witnessed that the bus driver was 44 f'ing minutes late. How in the hell was that even possible???
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not mistaken at all because you're correct. To me, it think it was more convenient when #94 was operated by Chicago because on 74th's behalf, I was on that route a few months ago when I looked at the clever device and witnessed that the bus driver was 44 f'ing minutes late. How in the hell was that even possible???

If we're talking convenient from CTA's point of view, it's actually more logistical to have the route at 74th because of the fact that under the current route structure the southern layover point (for the operators not passengers as I learned from Andre) is actually right there in the garage lot on western side of the garage complex. Late operators or delays in service can happen anywhere in the system and if taken as a sole consideration don't really reflect the garage's ability to perform well with that route. You also have to look at how far does the bus have to deadhead to get to the route, obstacles to an operator reaching a relief point, overall general traffic conditions on the roadways that route travels, potential street blockages along the route because of things like construction or emergency activity from CPD or CFD, mechanical problems with the bus, doing what CTA calls a double street where that operator now has to take on his leader's passengers and take up the slack because his leader's bus is removed from scheduled service, and so on and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1272 is still on a 74th route, do you think that this is a actual move rather then a loan?

#1905 and #1820 are back at their home garages and they were loaned out for days, so I think maybe it's still a loan, but the sighting of #1003-05 at Chicago makes me wonder if those might be transfers because they are in numerical order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're talking convenient from CTA's point of view, it's actually more logistical to have the route at 74th because of the fact that under the current route structure the southern layover point (for the operators not passengers as I learned from Andre) is actually right there in the garage lot on western side of the garage complex. Late operators or delays in service can happen anywhere in the system and if taken as a sole consideration don't really reflect the garage's ability to perform well with that route. You also have to look at how far does the bus have to deadhead to get to the route, obstacles to an operator reaching a relief point, overall general traffic conditions on the roadways that route travels, potential street blockages along the route because of things like construction or emergency activity from CPD or CFD, mechanical problems with the bus, doing what CTA calls a double street where that operator now has to take on his leader's passengers and take up the slack because his leader's bus is removed from scheduled service, and so on and so on.

Understandable and well said my friend! Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you guys want something to talk about explain this crazy looking bus.

attachicon.gifwhat the hell.jpg

attachicon.gifwhat the hell rear.jpg

Well, I can't tell you what it is used for(my speculation being some booster bus for dead batteries on buses or perhaps portable power for railcars?), but I can tell you what it is...

This is a 5300-Series Flxible Metro with the Cummins L-10 engine(yes, get excited fans of 5745-5765!) Classic way of knowing this...

  • Rails at the front are black and angled differently. The 6000's were painted yellow and slanted at a lower angle
  • Alcoa rims. The only 5300-Series buses with these rims were 5745-5765, 5300-5744 and 5766-5769 all had the steel wheels seen on the TMC's and Flyers at the time.
  • Slanted rear. The 5300-Series buses had the slight slant at the rear of the bus going toward the front. The 6000's were straightened out(no slant in the back)
  • Exhaust pipe. The 5300's had a tailpipe only for exhaust. The 6000's had a tailpipe with the cover on it.
  • Destination Sign: All 6000's got the front destination sign replaced with the LED display. This display(though blocky) is clearly a flip-dot display.

Now if anyone has a Work Bus roster and can see what TI-2 was formerly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday a friend of mine posted photos of the Western station on the Orange Line with a line of people wrapped around the entrance and the sidewalks. He said a person got hit by a train and that all the people were waiting for the #62 bus as an alternative. Here is the story reported via the Chicago Tribune. Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're talking convenient from CTA's point of view, it's actually more logistical to have the route at 74th because of the fact that under the current route structure the southern layover point (for the operators not passengers as I learned from Andre) is actually right there in the garage lot on western side of the garage complex. ...

Understandable and well said my friend! Thanks!

Another possible case of the loser leave town match. More than likely the layover is there because it is out of that garage, although an exception to that rule was that while the 24 bus used to turn through the Beverly garage lot, it was a 77 route. But, as discussed before, unless there was some real reason to get the bus out of Marquette Park, backtracking to 69th wasn't really serving any passengers, except those from 74th going to jury duty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...