NewFlyerMCI Posted January 12, 2015 Report Share Posted January 12, 2015 Most of the bus numbers mentioned have not been at 103rd and if I'm correct those bus numbers might have been 77th's buses from early to mid 2014. That would make sense then, because the majority of #1050-1100 that were running at the time I checked ran out of 77th, with the exception of 1 (can't remember the number) that was on the 53 (I thought that 52A, 53 and 53A ran out of 74th, I was wrong) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoungBusLover Posted January 12, 2015 Report Share Posted January 12, 2015 That would make sense then, because the majority of #1050-1100 that were running at the time I checked ran out of 77th, with the exception of 1 (can't remember the number) that was on the 53 (I thought that 52A, 53 and 53A ran out of 74th, I was wrong) Yeah those numbers are all out of the Chicago garage and routes #52A and #53A are ran out of 77th.Kedzie I believe handles route #53. #1041 and #1043 are perhaps loans or trades from Chicago,other than that everything is normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewFlyerMCI Posted January 12, 2015 Report Share Posted January 12, 2015 Yeah those numbers are all out of the Chicago garage and routes #52A and #53A are ran out of 77th.Kedzie I believe handles route #53. #1041 and #1043 are perhaps loans or trades from Chicago,other than that everything is normal. This was 6:30 Eastern time... Why would Chicago be running the 3, 4, 79, 87 and other various routes that run out of 77th? Unless you mean these below, in which case, my bad. What set of #1000's does Chicago have? Cause #1030 is on the 72 and searching the rest of the numbers close to it, the set of 1000s from 1000-1050 seem to run out of 103rd. Disrepancies are below #1030 on 72 (Chicago) #1041 on 132 (Kedzie?) #1042 on 54B (Chicago) #1043 on 20 (Kedzie) #1044 on 57 (Chicago) #1045 on 73 (Chicago #1046 on 20 #1049 on 20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajm522 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 What set of #1000's does Chicago have? Cause #1030 is on the 72 and searching the rest of the numbers close to it, the set of 1000s from 1000-1050 seem to run out of 103rd. Disrepancies are below #1030 on 72 (Chicago) #1041 on 132 (Kedzie?) #1042 on 54B (Chicago) #1043 on 20 (Kedzie) #1044 on 57 (Chicago) #1045 on 73 (Chicago #1046 on 20 #1049 on 20 ^^those busses use to at 77th minus 1030 I believe. Chicago takes care of both 20 and 132. Yeah those numbers are all out of the Chicago garage and routes #52A and #53A are ran out of 77th.Kedzie I believe handles route #53. #1041 and #1043 are perhaps loans or trades from Chicago,other than that everything is normal. Chicago takes care of 53. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 You beat me to it Garmon lol I saw 1233 earlier but 1109 I didn't see. What the heck is going on with all these buses popping up at these different locations is what I wanna know Y'all sneaking in the back of 74th taking our buses while the supervisors are sleep! I'm just kidding! :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 Finally, 82 gets artics it deserves, #4322 is on 82 That's because it's a school run from North Park mate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewFlyerMCI Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 That's because it's a school run from North Park mate. *sniff sniff* 82 has the passenger volume to warrant the need for artics, at least on weekdays, if not even weekday rush. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajm522 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 6685 on #39 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 *sniff sniff* 82 has the passenger volume to warrant the need for artics, at least on weekdays, if not even weekday rush. That's one of the reasons why Kedzie have some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainman8119 Posted January 13, 2015 Report Share Posted January 13, 2015 Blink and it'll all change, like the weather. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buslover88 Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 *sniff sniff* 82 has the passenger volume to warrant the need for artics, at least on weekdays, if not even weekday rush. I rode a 4000 on #82 at about 9:00pm on a weekday night not too long ago, so I believe that #82 does at times gets artic coverage. I've seen numerous artics on that route during rush-hour, even if they are school runs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajm522 Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 1903 as a nightcar currently on #8. Kind of late to be sending out a whatever type of bus... will keep eye on it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jajuan Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 *sniff sniff* 82 has the passenger volume to warrant the need for artics, at least on weekdays, if not even weekday rush. Kedzie runs artics on the 82 interspersed with assigned 1000s quite regularly on weekdays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 14, 2015 Report Share Posted January 14, 2015 Just as #1229 was at Kedzie this past Monday, it's back at 77th while on #8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajm522 Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Just as #1229 was at Kedzie this past Monday, it's back at 77th while on #8. Was that recently a Kedzie bus? because on #1 this am bus had a "7" sticker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusHunter Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Well #1903 is still on the #3. I'm wondering if I should change it on the roster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Well #1903 is still on the #3. I'm wondering if I should change it on the roster? No because 77th being too damn sneaky with these unusual moves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Was that recently a Kedzie bus? because on #1 this am bus had a "7" sticker? It used to be Kedzie's a few years ago. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 It used to be Kedzie's a few years ago. Basically, a few years ago doesn't count any more. By my count (which may be wrong) it was originally a 77th bus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoungBusLover Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 I have no clue as to why a person would put themselves in such great danger like that but stupidity wins this battle........... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBj4nVUlv2E 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garmon757 Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Basically, a few years ago doesn't count any more. By my count (which may be wrong) it was originally a 77th bus. Correct. It infiltrated 77th first. Then Kedzie did a brief stint of getting #1226-29 before releasing them to Forest Glen before returning back to 77th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strictures Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 I have no clue as to why a person would put themselves in such great danger like that but stupidity wins this battle........... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBj4nVUlv2E A guaranteed, future Darwin Award winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BusHunter Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Too much Cooley High for that person!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicagoNova Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 77th's 1261 on #71. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busjack Posted January 15, 2015 Report Share Posted January 15, 2015 Too much Cooley High for that person!! Good recall on that one. However, one couldn't hang onto the air conditioner cover of a 1963 era bus. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.